Webflow and Google close the gap between ads and site results


Marketing teams often struggle to connect what happens before a click with what happens after, especially when running Google Ads campaigns. Ads are built and managed in one place, while website performance and conversions live somewhere else. That gap can slow decision-making and make it harder to understand which campaigns are actually working.

That is the problem Webflow and Google are trying to narrow with a new integration that brings Google Ads campaign creation and performance tracking directly into the Webflow platform. According to a product update published on Webflow’s website, the integration allows teams to set up, run, and monitor Google Ads campaigns without leaving their site-building environment.

The move reflects a wider shift in marketing tools toward tighter links between content, advertising, and measurement, especially as automation plays a larger role in campaign management.

Bringing ads closer to the website

Based on details shared by Webflow, the integration is delivered through a native Google Ads for Webflow app, now available in the Webflow Marketplace. Once connected, a company’s Google Ads account can be linked directly to its Webflow sites, allowing teams to manage ads alongside their web content.

The update also supports Google’s Performance Max campaigns, which use automation to place ads across Google Search, YouTube, Display, Gmail, Discover, and Maps. Webflow’s announcement explains that marketers can create these campaigns using existing site assets, such as images, copy, and URLs already stored in Webflow.

Martech360 reports that this approach reduces the need to move between tools when launching or adjusting campaigns. Rather than building ads in Google Ads and then reviewing site behaviour elsewhere, marketers can view campaign metrics and on-site activity all in one place.

Why this matters for measurement

One of the recurring challenges in digital marketing is linking ad spend to real outcomes. While most teams track clicks and impressions, determining what users do after seeing a website frequently necessitates additional setup and manual analysis.

According to Webflow’s documentation, the integration handles much of the tagging and tracking required to connect Google Ads with site activity. This may help teams reduce the time spent on technical configuration, especially for standard conversion events such as form submissions or purchases.

An analysis published by TMCnet points out that closer ties between ads and site data can help teams react faster. If a campaign drives traffic to a page that performs poorly, marketers may be able to spot the issue earlier and adjust either the ad or the page itself.

This is particularly relevant as more campaigns rely on automated bidding and targeting. While automation can handle delivery at scale, teams still need clear signals to guide creative and structural changes.

How marketers are reacting

Some early users have shared their experiences publicly. In a LinkedIn post referenced by Webflow, Abby Liebenthal, Head of Marketing and Experiences at Fried Egg Golf, described how the integration affects campaign planning.

“Having Google Ads inside Webflow changes how we think about promotion,” Liebenthal said. “It allows our team to move from idea to live campaign faster.”

Another perspective comes from Ben Geller, Director of Product Marketing at You.com, who was quoted in a MartechVibe article covering the launch. Geller said the integration helps teams tailor messaging more closely to audience intent and ensure users land on pages built for specific campaigns.

These comments offer a glimpse into how some teams see value in reducing friction between content and advertising, though results will vary depending on how each organisation sets up and uses the tools.

Limits and trade-offs

While tighter integration can simplify workflows, it does not remove the need for careful planning. Webflow’s own integration guide notes that certain site behaviours, such as AJAX-based form submissions, may still require custom tracking steps to ensure conversions are recorded accurately.

There is also the broader question of control. Performance Max campaigns rely heavily on Google’s automation, which can limit visibility into where ads appear and why certain decisions are made. The Webflow integration makes these campaigns easier to manage, but it does not change how Google’s underlying systems work.

For teams that prefer hands-on control or advanced reporting, separate analytics and ad management tools may still play a role.

A sign of where marketing tools are heading

Viewed in context, the Webflow and Google Ads integration reflects a larger trend in marketing technology. Platforms that once focused on a single task — building websites or running ads — are now trying to reduce the gaps between creation, distribution, and measurement.

As Webflow explained in its product update, the goal is to help teams “connect creative work with performance data.” That language points to a growing demand for tools that support faster feedback and fewer manual handoffs.

For small and mid-size teams in particular, the appeal lies in simplicity. Managing fewer platforms can free up time, even if more specialised tools are still needed for deeper analysis.

The integration does not promise better results on its own. But by bringing ad creation and site performance closer together, it gives marketers another way to understand how their campaigns play out once users arrive.

(Photo by Myriam Jessier)

See also: Inside Google’s push to blend AI chat and online shopping

Find out more about the Digital Marketing World Forum series and register here.

Tags: advertising, ai, campaigns, digital marketing, google, personalisation