Software teams inside large companies have been testing AI coding tools for more than a year, but many of those efforts stayed limited to pilots or optional experiments. That appears to be changing inside Microsoft, where Anthropic’s Claude Code is now being used more widely across internal engineering teams for everyday development work.
The wider rollout was first reported by The Verge, which described how Microsoft has moved Claude Code beyond small trials and into regular use across parts of its engineering organisation. Rather than treating AI coding tools as side projects, Microsoft is bringing them closer to the centre of how engineers write, review, and prototype code.
The shift suggests a growing belief that AI systems are more than just helpers for small tasks, but may also shape how software is built at scale.
Claude Code is designed to help developers generate, edit, and reason through code using natural language prompts. Inside Microsoft, it is being used for tasks such as drafting functions, exploring ideas during early design stages, and speeding up routine coding work. While similar tools already exist, the decision to expand internal use matters because of Microsoft’s size and influence over developer tools.
For years, Microsoft has shaped how developers work with products such as Visual Studio, GitHub, and Azure. When a company of that size changes its internal habits, it frequently signals where broader tooling may head next.
From experiments to daily use
Many large tech firms have tested AI coding tools in limited ways, often with strict controls. Early concerns focused on code quality, security risks, and whether developers would trust output that they did not completely write themselves. Internal adoption was often gradual as teams considered the dangers.
The wider use of Claude Code suggests that Microsoft now recognises enough value to justify a wider rollout. Rather than replacing engineers, the tool is positioned to reduce friction in daily work. Engineers can instruct the system to sketch out code, explain unfamiliar areas, or suggest fixes, and then review and adjust the output themselves.
This approach mirrors how many developers already use tools like GitHub Copilot. Industry surveys have shown that AI-assisted coding is already common in many teams. GitHub’s most recent Octoverse report found that a growing share of developers rely on AI tools for routine coding tasks, even when those tools are not formally required.
The difference lies in how deeply the tool is being woven into internal workflows. Instead of leaving usage up to individuals, teams are beginning to treat AI assistance as part of the standard development process.
That shift changes expectations. When AI tools are optional, they remain personal productivity aids. When they become part of team workflows, they start to shape how projects are planned, reviewed, and maintained.
Why Claude Code stands out
Claude Code is built on Anthropic’s Claude models, which are often described as strong at reasoning through longer tasks and maintaining context across extended prompts. For developers, that can matter when working with big codebases or complex systems where knowing context is as crucial as writing new lines of code.
The tool allows engineers to work in natural language, asking questions about existing code or requesting changes without needing to spell out every detail in syntax. That can speed up early exploration, particularly during prototyping or refactoring.
Microsoft’s interest in Claude Code is notable given its close ties to OpenAI. The company has invested heavily in OpenAI models and already integrates them across products like GitHub Copilot. Using Anthropic’s tools alongside those systems implies a more flexible strategy than relying on a single model provider.
It also reflects a broader reality for developers: teams are increasingly mixing tools from many different vendors based on their strengths rather than committing to one system for all tasks.
What this means for developers
For developers working inside Microsoft, broader use of AI coding tools may change how time is spent. Less effort may go into repetitive tasks, while more attention shifts to reviewing output, making design choices, and understanding system behaviour.
That does not remove the need for strong coding skills. In some ways, it raises the bar. Developers still need to spot errors, judge whether suggestions make sense, and ensure that code meets security and performance standards.
Outside Microsoft, the move sends a signal to other companies weighing similar choices. If AI tools become part of standard workflows at a firm of this scale, smaller teams may feel more confident doing the same.
Research published in Science last year suggested that close to one-third of new code written in the US already involved some form of AI assistance, pointing to how quickly these tools are becoming part of everyday development.
It may also influence hiring and training. Teams could place a greater emphasis on skills like code review, system design, and prompt writing, while expecting AI tools to handle more routine drafting.
Open questions remain
Despite the momentum, several questions remain unresolved. One is how teams measure the impact of AI coding tools beyond speed. Faster output does not always lead to better software, and bugs introduced by AI systems can be hard to trace.
Another concern is consistency. When multiple developers rely on AI tools, differences in prompts or tool behaviour could lead to uneven code styles or logic choices. Teams may need new guidelines to keep codebases coherent.
There are also longer-term questions about dependency. As AI tools become more embedded, teams may find it harder to work without them, especially if tools change pricing, access, or behaviour over time.
A sign of where development is heading
Microsoft’s broader use of Claude Code does not mark the end of human-written software, but it does point to a shift in how software is produced. AI systems are moving from optional helpers to tools that shape daily work.
For developers, the change is less about replacement and more about adaptation. Writing code may involve more conversation with machines, more review of generated output, and more focus on judgment rather than syntax.
See also: Android updates are changing, and developers will feel it in 2026
Want to dive deeper into the tools and frameworks shaping modern development? Check out the AI & Big Data Expo, taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. Explore cutting-edge sessions on machine learning, data pipelines, and next-gen AI applications. The event is part of TechEx and co-located with other leading technology events. Click here for more information.
DeveloperTech News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.
